Stanislaus — Dec re probate referee pdf

Source: https://www.stanislaus.courts.ca.gov/system/files/dec_re_probate_referee_pdf.pdf

Sparse pages use OCR; original PDF remains authoritative.

STANISLAUS

STANISLAUS

800 11th Street

Modesto, Ca 95354

ESTATE OF (Name): CASE NUMBER: PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

1. 1am over the age of 18 and not a party to this cause. | am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing occurred.
2. My residence or business address is (specify):
3. | served the foregoing declaration on the probate referee named below by enclosing a copy in an envelope addressed as shown below AND (a) depositing the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service with the postage fully prepaid (b) placing the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shawn in item 4 following our ordinary business practices. | am readily familiar with this business' practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
4. (a) Date of deposit: (b) Place of deposit (city and state):
5. Name of probate referee served:
6. Address on envelope:

| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: {TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) ORDER DESIGNATING PROBATE REFEREE UPON EXERCISE OF RIGHT TO REMOVE THE FIRST PROBATE REFEREE DESIGNATED BY THE COURT Upon consideration of the foregoing declaration of the fiduciary, the first probate referee designated by the court is removed and IT IS ORDERED THAT: one of the probate referees provided for by law is designated the probate referee in the above-entitled proceeding to appraise property of the estate. The probate referee is also designated to reappraise from time to time for purpose of sale any or all of the estate property. DATE: JUDGE/COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT F0182-905 (R7/89) ‘iS siete Page two of two