Skip to content

ARTICLE 3

U.S. Income Tax Treaty — belgium tax treaty documents: belgtech.pdf · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

General Definitions

This Article sets out definitions of certain of the basic terms used in the proposed Convention. A number of important terms, however, are defined elsewhere in the Convention.

Any term used in this Convention which is not defined therein shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the meaning which it has under the laws of the State which is imposing

the tax. However, in a case where a term has a different meaning under the laws of Belgium and the United States or where the meaning under the laws of one or both of the States is not clear, the competent authorities may agree on a uniform definition. See Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure). While treaties in the past did not specify the power of the competent authorities to resolve such differences in definitions, this power is nevertheless inherent in the authority set forth in the mutual agreement article of these treaties to resolve "difficulties or doubts."

This Article defines geographical Belgium and geographical United States to include their respective continental shelves. The addition of a definition of the continental shelf is intended to clarify what the Contracting States consider to be included within their respective jurisdictions to tax. The United States continental shelf is defined as the seabed and subsoil of the adjacent submarine areas beyond the territorial sea over which the United States exercises exclusive rights in accordance with international law for the purpose of exploration and exploitation of the natural resources of such area, but only to the extent that the person, property, or activity to which this Convention is being applied is connected with such exploration or exploitation. For example the income earned by a ship and its employees engaged in taking seismograph soundings on the United States continental shelf will be treated for tax purposes the same as the income from a comparable activity on the land of one of the States of the United States. A comparable definition is used in the case of Belgium. The definition of the continental shelf in the case of the United States only includes the continental shelf surrounding the 50 States. Thus, for example, the continental shelf surrounding Puerto Rico is not included. If the treaty were extended beyond the 50 States and the District of Columbia (see Article 29 - Extension to Territories) the continental shelf of the extended areas could also be covered. The defined continental shelf is only part of the United States or Belgium, as the case may be in limited situations. It is included only to the extent that a person or property or activity to which the Convention is being applied is connected with exploration or exploitation of the continental shelf. The phrase “connected with” does not require physical attachment to the continental shelf to be within the scope of the definition.

The Article also defines "United States corporation" and “Belgian corporation.” Because of the difference in concept, an entity could under Belgian law be considered to be a Belgian corporation and under United States law to be a United States corporation. For purposes of the proposed Convention, such a corporation would be treated as a corporation of neither State because of the provisions in the definitions of a corporation of the United States, and a corporation of Belgium, that an entity may not be considered a corporation of the United States, or Belgium, if it is a corporation of the other State under domestic law of that other State. While the benefits of the Convention would generally be unavailable in such cases, it is relatively easy for taxpayers to avoid dual residency.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — U.S. Income Tax Treaty — belgium tax treaty documents: belgtech.pdf

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.